Deal of the Century: Changing the Language If Not Much Else
If Trump’s Deal of the Century had any binding enforcement capabilities, it would be an incredible coup for Israel. If the deal is merely a new starting point for negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel, it is more of the same of what we have already seen for the past 70 years.
With one major difference!
The frame of reference has been changed. And the language used to describe the situation has changed. I do believe this “deal” is more of a new starting point for non-negotiations, unless the Palestinian Arab leadership tiger changes its stripes, that is. Let me show you some screenshots of portions of the document released last night and called, Peace to Prosperity:
This finally recognizes that the war in 1967 was a defensive war and Israel had no obligation to give up land to the aggressors. The fact that this was land originally captured and occupied by those very same aggressors in 1948 is nowhere stated in this document, but at least there is recognition of the fact that winners do not give up land. Israel did, patsies that we are! And the document says it clearly. So much for Israel stealing so-called Palestinian land (that never was ever Palestinian Arab land in the first place).
Finally, recognition for the Jewish refugees created at the same time as Arab refugees who fled from the war-torn region when the Arab states waged war against the Jews.
Later in the document, it is clearly stated that Israel is not going to be the solution for these Arab refugees, that not one Arab will set be allowed to move to Israel; rather, the Arab states must take responsibility for having kept these Arabs in limbo, using them as pawns, in the language of the Deal-of-the-Century document.
The deal also calls for the Arab states who expelled the Jews who had lived there for centuries (far longer than Arabs had resided in the British Mandate region, it should be mentioned) to provide long overdo compensation to Israel for having absorbed these Jewish refugees that they, the Arab states, created.
Changing the focus – pressure is now on the Palestinian Arab leadership to show that they care about a better future for their population. Israel is no longer regarded as the source of all the problems. Also, see the following statement:
Perhaps the Palestinian Arabs, the simple folk, that is, will rise up against the leaders who have used them and abused them. If this document gets translated into Arabic and distributed freely on the Internet for them to read, we might see a new Arab Spring in the PA, demanding what they deserve — leadership that cares about their welfare more than about killing Jews.
Let us now see how the Arabs living in these towns choose to define themselves with this option on the line: will they define themselves as Palestinians and vote to belong to the potential new sort-of-state, or will they vote to remain Israeli citizens, with all the benefits being part of Israel entails? If they vote to remain in Israel, then I anticipate a change in attitude and increased engagement in our Israeli way of life.
I am not happy with the Temple Mount remaining under Jordanian Waqf control, but the Deal-of-the-Century document does insist that everyone should be able to pray there and not just the Muslims. That will not go down well with the PA leadership. Complaints about Jews polluting the ground with our feet has been a rallying cry to kill Jews for a long long time.
Well, we built the barrier and that means we set ourselves up for this.
This is new! We can walk back anything we compromise on if the Arabs-who-now-call-themselves-Palestinians do not abide by the rules.
The deal calls for release of Palestinians held in Israel and of Israelis held by Hamas. But:
And the Palestinian Arab prisoners that were convicted of murder or attempted murder or conspiracy to murder will not be released to the PA under any circumstance.
It is about time that this is said out loud. And it should be repeated over and over again. But I do take issue with the last sentence — it should say, instead, that Jordan has valiantly refused to treat its Palestinian Arab citizens as full fledged citizens with rights equal to those of the Bedouin within her bounds.
Here is the crux of the matter — the threat posed by the Iranian regime is the main threat to regional, if not global, peace and security. It is not Israel. If the world wants to protect itself against the Iranian machinations, it needs to work openly with Israel and not just secretly behind the scenes as has been happening more and more recently.
The Palestinian leadership has nothing to offer. They just have to get out of the way. The Deal of the Century seeks to do just that — to get them out of the way.
And it is up to Israel to act boldly now. The United States has given Israel the green light to finally declare our sovereignty over our own lands, the lands in which our peoplehood was born — and to do so immediately. If we do not blink, if the current government does not squander this opportunity, we stand to finally behave like the proud nation we should be.
The Israeli Left cannot agree to the bit about the triangle Arabs. Without them, the Right has an unquestioned majority of the Knesset.
Except that it gives those citizens the right to determine for themselves what they want. If “the Left” does not agree to that, then they are patronizing. Hmmm.
The main reservation I have about giving them the “Triangle” is the fact that it is too close to Israeli towns like Afula, Hadera, kibboutzim etc. in the region. Besides the fact of course that the land historically, morally, traditionally, sentimentally , religiously and indeed legally belongs to the Jews. Also I suppose no Israeli Arab right in his mind would want to live under the PA, Fatah, Hamas..they have it damn too good in Israel!
I believe this paragraph was actually tongue-in-cheek and calling their bluff. There is no way they want to be under PA rule.
As they proved when Liberman proposed it a few years ago.
Which is why I think this sentence is very optimistic: “If they vote to remain in Israel, then I anticipate a change in attitude and increased engagement in our Israeli way of life.”
Thanks for doing this work on our behalf, Sheri.
You stated, “The United States has given Israel the green light to finally declare our sovereignty over our own lands,” Why does Israel, a sovereign nation, need the permission of the United States — or any nation, for that matter — to annex its own land? What has the US ‘given’ to Israel in this deal that they couldn’t do on their own?
You are right to ask this. We, as a sovereign nation, could have, should have, done this on our own (and done it way back in 1967). But we did not do it then, when it would have seemed most right in the eyes of the rest of the world. In the meantime, the Palestinian Arabs have built up such a propaganda force that the rest of the world would not see the justification of such a move today. The USA, in this document, has declared that it is our right and that they will give us cover in the UN for this move.
Trump plan will not bring about peace unless Pal-Arabs turn into Finns in next 4 years as they would have to recognize that the plan would grant them a better life by agreeing to live as peaceful neighbors to the Jewish State of Israel. They could create Costa Rica in the Middle-East. Instead so far we have 1000 Abbas NOs and Hamas sitting in the same room with Fatah to plan how many different verbal or violent ways they can so NO!
Trump plan positives it changes parameters of:
Pal Right of Return (NONE)
Jerusalem
Jordan Valley as Israel’s Eastern Border
Puts onus on Pals to stop terrorism & funding it if they want a State
Allows Israelis to apply sovereignty to all “Settlements” Plus Jordan Valley
Allows Israelis to keep building per their law in all existing settlements plus E1 (Maalah Adumim)
Puts in Writing a Demand of de-militarized Pal State if they want to be a state
Demands Hamas (& Gaza) demilitarize and turn in weapons + come under control of PA before a state would be in consideration:
Requires Pals to agree to a Jewish State before Pal Statehood
Requires Pals to agree to Israeli Security in all land west of the Jordan River
Israeli sovereignty over all settlements plus Jordan Valley will recognized as soon as Israel applies its civil law.
Horrible Points:
Tunnel from Gaza would be a danger to Hebron would be a danger to Israel. Israel just spent lots of money and time coming up with an anti-Tunnel system.
15 Settlements would be in danger as Isolated.
Israel would be required to give up open spaces in Judea and Samaria plus land in Negev